There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
You will learn that the ruling made by the High Court was stuck to. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.